| Overview
| Highlights
|
| Participants' profile
|
|
The list of participants is impressive from several angles. |
| |
It includes companies such as Infosys, Wipro
who have not only been the first ones to issue stock options to
employees, but have also been trend setters in terms of coverage,
communications and adherence to best practices. |
| |
Number of ESOP holder employees for all the
participating companies exceeds 30,000.This forms a significant
proportion of total ESOP coverage in India. |
| |
Around 80% of the respondents are listed companies.
The impact of underwater options is more tangible in this sector
because the market value is readily available. This has contributed
immensely in making the findings of this survey more representative
and relevant. |
|
Fairly significant share of 27% of Non IT companies has also helped
in covering the sectoral views on this subject. |
| How common is this phenomena? |
The findings here are in line with
the general perception that most of the companies are grappling
with Underwater Options.
We would however like to point out that even though 73% of the companies
have Underwater Options, the percentage of options that are Underwater
would be lesser. In case of many companies,who have made several
grants, some grants are Underwater whereas others are In-the-money.
It would need further analysis and information to comment on the
percentage of options that are Underwater.
The figure of 73% is however very relevant to understand that 3
out of every 4 companies have this issue on hand and will have to
address it sometime.
 |
| Perceived reason |
Overwhelming majority of companies
feel that the temporary downturn in the market is the sole reason
for options losing their charm.
In essence the message is that cyclical upswing in the market will
automatically take care of this loss in value and no action need
to be taken. This view is confirmed when 73% of the companies say
that they have not considered re-pricing.
We firmly believe in this rationale. However, what needs to be seen
(on a case to case basis) is what is the extent of loss in value.
There is a popular belief that many companies will not see the same
valuations as in the recent past. In which case the reduction in
value is permanent and needs corrective action.
This indeed is a call every company has to take based on individual
circumstances. There is no generalised solution. |
| Employee Communication |
Effective communication to employees
has been a neglected aspect in the overall ESOP implementation process
in India.
In our opinion, one of the major reasons for ESOPs losing their
sheen today is that it was marketed/communicated improperly in the
first place. Expectations of employees were raised to very high
levels. They were not educated about the associated risks and downside
of this instrument.
The survey findings strongly support our views. More than 2/3rd
of the companies did not educate the employees about the associated
risks and downside of the plan.
We believe that in the coming days, effective and timely communication
and creating awareness about this instrument is going to play a
very crucial role in the ESOP implementation process. Employees
need to told about Why are the options Underwater? What is the company
doing about it? Why is the company not revising the terms? What
should employees do to mitigate the loss,etc. |
| Implications of Re-pricing |
Are companies aware about the various
implications of the Re-pricing decision would have? If they are
aware, then what will drive their decision to re-price?
We find the overall awareness about the implications is not very
high. Most of the companies (80%) are aware about the impact on
the share holders, but a significant number (33%) is not aware about
the accounting implications. More than 50% of the companies are
not aware about the alternative methods for addressing this issue.
More than 67% of the companies do not know the US GAAP related impact
of re-pricing.
Benefit to employees seem to be driving the decision to re-price
for most of the companies (80%). The impact on shareholders,accounting
hit, impact on equity, etc. are perceived to be issues of lesser
importance. This response is probably because of lack of awareness
and our findings corroborate this opinion.
 |
| Alternative approaches to Re-pricing
|
In the US where underwater options
is not a new phenomena companies have tried several ways to retain
the value of options and maintain employee interest in them.
We tried to find out whether some of these approaches appeal to
the Indian companies.
On the whole it appears that they are relatively less inclined to
try out new methods.
One of the reasons, we feel is because there is resistance to change
whatever has been laid down. In India, we are yet to see companies
having several plans, different structures etc. The approach is
to fit in every employee in the same structure. Hence we see outright
rejection of 'selective re-pricing". If the senior team was
responsible for lack of performance, why not penalise them more
than the junior team. Why not differentiate?
There is a need to create awareness about the methods such as frequent
grants, shorter terms and exercise periods etc. These in isolation
or in a combination, can be effectively used to pre-empt the widespread
occurrence of Underwater options. |
| Time frame for action |
More than 50% of the companies
want to address the issue but an equal proportion have not yet decided
when they want to take it up.
Perhaps they want to wait for the upswing in the sentiments or they
want to link it to the time when the compensation structure is reviewed.
|
| Conclusion |
About six months ago, we came out
with India's first survey ESOP Design Practices 2001 addressing
the information need on how companies are designing their plans.
This time we took up another major contemporary issue of Underwater
Options. We have tried to make companies think on this issue and
in the process create awareness on this subject about which very
little is known to the Indian corporates.
We believe we have achieved our limited objective. As we proceed
further, such critical issues will be discussed more openly and
candidly thereby leading to more information and knowledge sharing.
We would have then achieved our larger objective.
In the meanwhile look forward to more such informative and analytical
studies.
 |
| In case you need access to the complete
Survey report please write to EDinfo@esopdirect.com |